|
|
12-11-2004
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
A very complex deployment, Does it possible?
Please refer to the picture for dail information.
For stability consideration, the IcePack/Registry must be at 172.0.20.XXX I have read the Glacier and Glacier document, and find out no way to setup this deployment. I hope you would give me some advice. Does it possible? 
|
|
12-11-2004
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
I'm afraid the diagram alone does not provide enough information about what you are trying to achieve.
Note that detailed design consultation is outside the scope of the free support we can give here on this forum. If you would like us to provide you with commercial consulting, please contact us at info@zeroc.com.
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to pass complex C++ containers in ICE? | jvme | Help Center | 1 | 08-04-2005 06:30 PM |
| Passing complex data structures: output parameters or return values? | nactyx | Help Center | 4 | 07-15-2005 08:17 PM |
| Patch for escaping deployment descriptor variables | benoit | Patches | 0 | 04-04-2005 05:26 PM |
| have any improve in distribute deployment? | soloman817 | Comments | 2 | 01-06-2005 12:07 AM |
| Some question about deployment of ICE | RusselHarvey | Help Center | 12 | 08-04-2004 04:17 AM |
Linear Mode
